Beyond the Offer: How to Evaluate a New Firm's Platform Before You Make the Move

‍ ‍

Beyond the Offer: How to Evaluate a New Firm's Platform Before You Make the Move‍ ‍

The lateral partner market is moving faster than at any point in recent memory. According to Law.com Compass data, lateral partner hiring across the Am Law 200 grew by 20% in the year ending September 30, 2025— and 2026 is showing no signs of slowing down. Latham & Watkins alone has welcomed at least 18 lateral partners so far this year; Dechert has brought on more than 25. Across California, litigation partners are leading a wave of movement that's reshaping which firms will dominate the market in the years ahead.‍ ‍

In other words, if you've been thinking about a move — and you have a practice worth moving — firms are absolutely open for business. But let me share something I've observed over many years of placing partners at national and international firms: the offer is the easy part. The hard part is knowing whether the firm is truly the right platform for the practice you've built. Getting that wrong is costly in ways that don't show up until 18 months in.‍ ‍

Here's what I tell every candidate I work with.‍‍ ‍

Compensation Structures Are More Complex Than the Numbers Suggest‍ ‍

An attractive guaranteed compensation package is designed to get your attention — and it will. But savvy candidates need to look past year one. The fundamental question is: how does this firm actually compensate equity partners over time, and how does that system treat a practice like mine?‍ ‍

Is origination credited generously, or does it erode the moment you collaborate with others? How is business you developed at your prior firm credited going forward — and for how long? Is there a lockstep or merit-based component, and where does your practice area typically land in that calculation? What does the equity buy-in look like, and on what timeline?‍ ‍

These aren't impolite questions. They are the questions. A reputable firm will walk you through the compensation model clearly. If the answers are vague or consistently deferred, that tells you something important about the culture you'd be stepping into.‍‍ ‍

Client Portability Is Rarely as Simple as You Think‍ ‍

Research shows that 73% of clients say they would follow their lead partner to a new firm — which sounds reassuring. The reality is more nuanced, and it varies enormously by client type, matter complexity, and relationship depth.‍ ‍

Institutional clients with preferred provider agreements may not have flexibility to follow you, regardless of the relationship. Clients in regulated industries — financial services, healthcare, energy — often have their own conflicts and approval processes that add delay and uncertainty. And publicly traded companies may be subject to board-driven outside counsel decisions that have nothing to do with you personally.‍ ‍

Before you model your business case on a full book transition, do an honest client-by-client analysis. How many clients are truly "yours" in the portable sense? How many are firm clients that you service? Which relationships are deep and durable, and which depend on infrastructure — a team, a practice group, a referral network — that lives at your current firm? A thoughtful recruiter will help you stress-test these assumptions rather than simply validate your most optimistic projections.‍‍ ‍

Practice Area Fit Goes Beyond Practice Group Name‍ ‍

"We have a strong [fill in the practice] group" is one of the most common things a firm will tell you during the courtship process. What you need to understand is whether their version of that practice is actually aligned with yours.‍ ‍

If you're a transactional M&A partner, does the target firm have the capital markets, finance, and tax depth to handle the deals you originate? If you're a litigator, do they have trial capability, or is the expectation that cases settle? If you're in IP, do they serve the technology or life sciences sectors that drive your client base — or will your work be outlier business that the firm doesn't fully understand how to price or support?‍ ‍

In the California market particularly, I see partners make moves to platforms that look strong on paper but don't have the complementary capabilities — or the billing rate structure — to support a high-value national or cross-border practice. Spending a focused hour with the chair of your target practice group, asking specifically about recent matters and client industries served, will tell you far more than a pitch deck ever will.‍‍ ‍

Conflicts and Culture: Deal breakers That Surface After You Arrive‍ ‍

Conflicts review is often treated as a formality in the early stages of a lateral conversation — but it should be treated as due diligence. At major national and international firms, the conflicts landscape is increasingly complex. A firm with a robust financial services or private equity practice may have standing conflicts that affect your ability to represent clients you consider core to your book.‍ ‍

Culture is harder to diligence but equally important. I'd encourage every candidate to have honest, off-the-record conversations with current partners at the firm — ideally people who are not your advocates in the process. Ask about lateral integration: how long it actually takes to feel fully embedded, whether origination credit has ever been disputed, whether the firm genuinely operates as a unified platform or behaves like a collection of fiefdoms. Ask about leadership responsiveness when problems arise.‍

The answers to these questions are almost never volunteered in a formal recruiting process. But they are the ones that determine whether a lateral move becomes a success story or an expensive regret.‍‍ ‍

What This Market Means for You

The 2026 lateral market is, by most measures, the most favorable environment for candidates in years. Compensation packages are competitive — partners with portable corporate books of business are seeing offers reflecting 15–20% increases over current compensation, and regulatory and litigation specialists are close behind at 13–18%. Firms are hiring with intention, but they are also hiring with speed, and speed can work in your favor — or against it — depending on your level of preparation.

If you're seriously considering a move, now is the right time to have a structured conversation about your options — not to make a hasty decision, but to understand what the market looks like for a practice like yours and to evaluate potential platforms with the rigor that a decision of this magnitude deserves.

At Strategic Search Resources, that's precisely what I do. As a former practicing attorney and managing partner, I bring a perspective to these conversations that goes well beyond the transactional. If you'd like to think through whether making a move in this market is right for your practice, I'd welcome the conversation.

Reach out at ssrlegal.com or contact C.J. Lovett directly.

‍ ‍

Previous
Previous

Advice for Partners considering a move (Compensation Intelligence)